Malpractice Untimely Prejudice
Plaintiff’s motion to vacate order that transferred malpractice case from Supreme to Civil Court under CPLR §325(d) and 22 NYCRR 202.13(a) providently denied where plaintiff waited nearly 4-years to vacate and failed to show prejudice as the case retains the monetary jurisdiction of Supreme Court. Leighton v Lowenberg ✉
|
Vacate Jud Default Judgment Service Meritorious Defense Reasonable Excuse Prejudice Compel Acceptance
Defendant’s motion to vacate $200,000 default judgment after inquest, and for leave to serve a late Answer, granted under CPLR §317 where it was not personally served with the Summons and Complaint in time to defend and it showed a potentially meritorious defense. Motion also granted under CPLR §5051(a)(1) on additional proof of a reasonable excuse, default was not willful or a pattern of neglect, and the policy favoring actions be decided on the merits. Weinberger v Wild Orchid Flowers Corp. ✉
|
Construction Liab.
Highway contractor for NYSDOT granted summary judgment on proof it adhered to the plans and specifications in its contract in the placement of orange construction barrels during the temporary closure of lanes and DOT inspected the work and approved the reopening of the lanes. Contractors can rely on plans and specifications provided unless they are so patently defective as to give notice of a potential danger. Plaintiff fell when his motorcycle struck a flattened orange barrel while changing lanes after the closed lanes were reopened. Corniel v CCA Civil-Halmar Intl., LLC ✉
|
Serious Injury Causation Experts
Plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment under fracture category for serious injury denied where his treating orthopedic surgeon’s opinion that a fracture was created when a portion of the acromion was removed during an acromioplasty of plaintiff’s shoulder did not eliminate all questions of whether it was caused by the MVA. Degachi v Faridi ✉
|
Premises Liab Stairs Building Code Dangerous Condition Building Code
Homeowner’s expert’s claim he did not see any code violations or maintenance deficiencies on the stairs failed to meet homeowner’s burden of showing absence of a dangerous condition where he did not address plaintiff’s allegations that handrail at top of stairs ended inches before the landing and handrail at bottom of stairs where plaintiff fell was too low when plaintiff reached for it. Lack of building code violations is not dispositive of common-law negligence claims. Karel v Pizzorusso ✉
|
Premises Liab Stairs Dangerous Condition Causation Notice Experts Building Code
Landlord failed to establish that difference in riser height of bottom step of interior staircase where tenant fell was not a dangerous condition as landlord’s expert’s found the riser height of the last step nearly 1.5” inches shorter than the other steps and his interpretation of what caused plaintiff to fall did not eliminate all questions of fact on causation and constructive notice looking at the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party.
The Court did not determine if there was a building code violation which is not necessary for common-law negligence. Cabanas v Qiu Yu Zou ✉
|
MVA Motion to Dismiss Graves Amendment
Bank failed to meet burden for dismissal on Graves amendment where its employee’s affidavit stating on review of records that the vehicle was leased by a dealership and assigned to the bank was not proof, the attached lease was illegible, and the bank did not submit a copy of the lease assignment. Tello v Upadhyaya ✉
|
Premises Liab Building Code Unknown Cause Speculation
Defendants granted summary judgment for decedent’s fall at top of exterior stairs where plaintiff only saw decedent as she was falling and her claim decedent was waving her arms in a way that suggested she was trying to grab onto something was speculative as to the cause of decedent’s fall. Plaintiff failed to show any condition identified by her expert, including violations of NYC building code and the MDL, were a proximate cause of the decedent’s fall. Lee v Widlanski ✉
|
Premises Liab Emotional Harm Create Condition Notice Last Inspection Recurring Condition
Amusement park met burden for summary judgment dismissing infant-plaintiff’s claim for emotional harm when rollercoaster unexpectedly stopped 5’-7’ from ground, trapping her for 15-minutes, on proof they inspected the roller coaster that day and found no defects and received no complaints before the incident. General awareness that the roller coaster stopped at times in previous years was insufficient to establish notice of a recurring condition of what caused it to stop on that day. J. G. v L.I. Adventureland ✉
|
MVA Rear End Pileup
Lead and middle vehicle drivers and owners granted summary judgment dismissing action on proof plaintiff rear ended middle vehicle, which was stopped in traffic, pushing it into lead vehicle. Sougstad v Capuano ✉
|