MVA Graves Amendment Admissibility Hearsay
Truck lessor’s motion for summary judgment on Graves amendment denied where it’s employee’s affidavit failed to lay business record foundation for lease, accident did not occur within period covered by lease, and there was no proof lease was extended. The employee affidavit failed to prove as a matter of law that the truck was not negligently maintained where it did not provide basis of the employee’s knowledge. Alfaro v Lavacca
|
Premises Liab Dangerous Condition Building Code Expert Aff
Defendants granted summary judgment where plaintiff tripped on speaker wire in his apartment and fell out window onto sidewalk on proof window was not a dangerous condition and they were not obligated to install window guards to protect an adult. Plaintiff’s expert failed to raise issue in opposition where opinion was not based on any rules, regulations, codes, standards, or the record. Fraser v Reclaim Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.
|
Labor Law §200 Assumption of Risk
Defendants granted summary judgment of Labor Law §200 and negligence claims where excavation laborer injured when shovel struck portion of rail not covered while shoveling concrete debris in subway tunnel under renovation as duty to provide safe workplace does not extend to hazards worker was specifically hired to correct. Pacheco v Judlau Contr., Inc.
|
Labor Law §240 Labor Law §241 Labor Law §200
Contractor granted summary judgment of Labor Law §§§240, 241, and 200 brought by apartment building owner’s property manager, who was sole member of the owner corporation, for injuries when stairs under construction collapsed as he was not a person entitled to protection under §§§240, 241, and 200. Bosconi v Thomas R. Stachecki Gen. Contr., LLC
|
Premises Liab Out of Possession
Building owner granted summary judgment where supermarket employee fell through floor opening for bakery lift on proof it was an out of position owner and pleadings did not allege a statutory violation. Gallina v 7901-11 13th Ave. Realty Corp.
|
MVA Bus Emergency Doctrine
NYCTA granted summary judgment on proof bus driver was faced with emergency situation not of his own making when a double parked vehicle made an illegal U-turn 5’ in front of him and that he acted reasonably driving no more than 15 mph, honked his horn to warn the double parked car, and held his foot hovering over the brakes. Driver not required to anticipate a sudden, illegal maneuver. Santana-Lizardo v New York City Tr. Auth.
|
False Arrest Malicious Prosecution Battery Late Notice of Claim Actual Knowledge Reasonable Excuse Prejudice NYC
Timely Notice of Claim by co-participant in altercation with Lyft driver where petitioner was arrested did not provide actual knowledge of essential elements of petitioner’s claim where [from lower court’s decision] it recited that petitioner left scene after driver called 911 without any mention of petitioner being arrested. Petitioner’s claim of ignorance of 90-day Notice of Claim requirement was not a reasonable excuse and he failed to show NYC was not prejudiced by delay. Matter of Beaton v City of New York
|
Labor Law §200 Control Create Condition
Defendants denied summary judgment of Labor Law §200 and negligence claims where plaintiff fell from tractor-trailed while manually rolling tarp to cover trash on the trailer due to defective tarping mechanism as plaintiff testified defendant directed him to cover the trash and there was a question of whether defendant caused the defect by allowing the trailer to be overfilled. Landron v Wil-Cor Realty Co. Inc.
|
Premises Liab Assumption of Risk Create Condition Foreseeability
Village denied summary judgment where 11-year-old injured when tire swing collided with railing on lack of proof it was not negligently designed which would unreasonably increase the risk above those inherent in playing on a tire swing and question on whether 11-year-old with limited experience with the tire swing was fully aware of and appreciated the risks of it being able to contact the railing. Village also failed to show they did not create the condition, have notice, or that the accident was unforeseeable. Berrin v Incorporated Vil. of Babylon
|
Premises Liab Slip/Trip Snow/Ice Storm in Progress Duty
Owner and snow contractor granted summary judgment where plaintiff slipped/fell on snow/ice in parking lot open to elements on 3-sides on proof there was a storm in progress. Temporary lull in the storm did not trigger a duty to remove snow before storm ended. Defendants’ experts showed there were blizzard conditions over a 24-hour period, a winter storm warning, a State Disaster Emergency declaration, and that the conditions were consistent with plaintiff’s testimony that it was snowing when he was put into the ambulance. Pennino v Brooklyn Kings Plaza, LLC
|
Med Mal Informed Consent Accepted Practice Causation Uncertified Records Raised For First Time Expert Aff
Defendants granted summary judgment on expert affidavit that they did not depart from accepted practice and injuries were not caused by any departures or lack of informed consent. Plaintiff’s argument that medical records relied upon by defendants were uncertified rejected as raised for the first time on appeal and plaintiff relied on the same records in opposition. Without submitting an expert affirmation, the plaintiff failed to raise an issue of fact in opposition. Benedetto v Tannenbaum
|
Premises Liab Slip/Trip Snow/Ice Open/Obvious Comparative Fault
Plaintiff granted summary judgment on liability and dismissal of comparative fault where he tripped and fell on fence posts he saw removed and placed on the ground 2-months before accident, in anticipation of a blizzard, which were covered by snow at time of his fall. That fence posts were covered in snow and plaintiff testified he did not see them in the weeks leading up to his accident eliminated question of whether they were open/obvious. Paget v PCVST-DIL, LLC
|
Premises Liab Slip/Trip Unknown Cause
Restaurant granted summary judgment on plaintiff’s EBT testimony that she did not know what caused her foot to get stuck in carpet, failingto raise an issue of fact on causation without speculation. Plaintiff’s attorney’s affirmation insufficient to raise issue of fact. Colini v Stino, Inc.
|
Premises Liab Slip/Trip Wet Floor Create Condition Notice Vicarious Liab
Hotel granted summary judgment where plaintiff, employee of cleaning contractor, slipped on soapy water in area not open to public that was spilled by carpet cleaning contractor 10-minutes before accident as hotel is not liable for independent contractor’s actions and did not create the condition or have notice in time remedy it. Diaz v LaGuardia Express, LLC
|
Serious Injury BP
Defendant failed to meet burden on serious injury for 90/180-day category alleged in BP where plaintiff’s testimony failed to identify plaintiff’s usual pre-accident activities or compare them to post accident activities. Reid v Edwards-Grant
|
Serious Injury ROM Causation Expert Aff Degenerative Conclusory
Defendants entitled to summary judgment on serious injury on neurologist’s report showing normal ROM, that alleged injuries resolved, and emergency physician’s report stating that ER records were inconsistent with claimed injuries. Plaintiff’s doctor failed to raise issue by recent finding of limited ROM without addressing degeneration in plaintiff’s MRI report or explaining why it was not related to degeneration. Testimony that plaintiff confined to bed/home for 6-weeks sufficient for summary judgment dismissing 90/180-day category claim. Stickney v Akhar
|
Serious Injury Degenerative Causation
By failing to address defendants’ radiologist’s findings that spine injuries were degenerative, plaintiff’s expert failed to raise an issue in opposition to defendants’ prima facie entitlement to summary judgment. Holmes v Parkinson
|
Assault 1983 Action Motion to Dismiss Police NYC
Motion to dismiss by NYC and police officer denied where plaintiff sufficiently pleaded an intentional assault and battery without probable cause, and no criminal charges were filed. Motion to dismiss 1983-action denied as assault and battery can form the basis of a constitutional violation by police officers acting under color of law. Corcoran v City of New York
|
Premises Liab Slip/Trip Stairs Dangerous Condition Raised For First Time Prejudice Expert Aff Conclusory Speculation
Defendants granted summary judgment on proof handrail plaintiff claimed was unstable was not defective, including video showing handrail did not move and that plaintiff was distracted and missed a step. Design defect theory raised for the first time in opposition was not considered where not pleaded. Plaintiff’s expert’s opinions were conclusory and speculative. Minor v East Harlem Tutorial Program, Inc.
|
Premises Liab Elevator Unsigned Transcript Res Ipsa Loquitor
Plaintiff did not dispute that elevator company made out entitlement to summary judgment with deposition testimony that plaintiff did not see suspected misalignment that caused his shoulder to pop out as he was pulling an ICU bed out of the elevator but assumed it misleveled, instead arguing that testimony should not be considered because it was unsigned. That argument was rejected as raised for the first time on appeal. Kachele v Nouveau El. Indus., Inc.
|
MVA Renew
Defendants in MVA denied leave to renew denial of prior motion for summary judgment where new facts offered would not have changed the determination. The court does not give the details of the proofs. Jian Feng Zhang v Roman
|